THERE is a
pet fear indulged perhaps unwittingly, but I think undoubtedly, for the sake of
bolstering a damaging status quo of heedless economic immigrating into
very small geographic regions with advanced economies, where the native
birthrate has been in an extraordinary decline. To disguise this decline and
the economic consequences which are claimed to follow them, as night the day, large numbers of people from less developed countries of far greater
geographic size, have been encouraged to settle in places like England,
Germany, France, and Italy, for they tend to have a much higher birthrate, and
they supply the appetites of vast business which seem to have outgrown their
home nations. I do not suggest that this pet fear, much dandled and indulged by
economists of a certain political persuasion, is entirely unfounded. It seems
to be quite logical that as populations age and decline their capacities for
pure labour (if that is the only valuable thing of which we think this life
consists) decreases, 'and with the economic decline, all other forms of
decline, real and imagined, will descend on us like unending hail storms to
batter us into an agonised unconsciousness, while more prosperous nations
chortle!' It may be this is true, but I can think of one very clear example
where it has not been.
Southern Ireland, called The Republic of,
has a smaller population now than it had in the year 1845, and not by a very
little but by a quarter, and yet this has consistently been one of the best performing
economies in the world by proportional rate of growth. It is astonishing to
observe how the Southern Irish economy has flourished and grown though the
country itself seems situated in such an unpromising geographical location,
though its population has between times shrunk to alarming levels and seemed
more than once on the point of jeopardy. What I mean to suggest by this
observation is that I think economic growth is not a direct effect of population
growth, but that it seems to be a very complicated matter highly dependent on education
and acumen. For this reason the most populous country in the world has at present
an economy less valuable than Japan's and Germany's, for this reason Indonesia,
Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil, and Bangladesh, the fourth to the eighth most
populous countries in the world are only the 16th, the 39th, the 9th, and the
33rd, largest economies in the world respectively. This will doubtless change
in time, but it will change because of factors other than population growth.
Now population growth is, in my view, the
single greatest cause at present of the ills which face the earth, and I mean
this regardless of race. A single human being demands and deserves a tremendous
amount in life in the way of space, sustenance, familiarity, energy, and
comfort. I believe the present human population of the earth is already too
large. It was six billion strong when I was born twenty-six years ago, now it
is eight billion strong and seems primed to reach practically ten billion by 2050.
I personally think that, although the earth and its societies can probably
sustain about 12 billion human beings to the minimum level of living
standards, it is extremely undesirable for everyone concerned that the world
population should pass beyond six or seven billion human beings. I happen to
live in one of the most densely populated nations on earth, and also in its
most densely populated region, and so I feel this very particularly. Every car
journey is longer than it might be, every visit involves anxiety about crowds
and space availability, every minute presents me with vehicles and human
activities, and this in the countryside. I know there are many concerned with
the care of elderly people who contend that we advanced nations really must
have immigrant populations to look after them (and what about the elderly in those
nations?) but I think this is a distraction. The problem involves the entire
world, in matters of pollution, water supplies, medicine supplies, civil
unrest, and general weal, clearly overpopulation is extremely damaging.
As for economic growth, surely everyone is aware that it is due to alterations
in practice rather than in breeding? The Southern Irish economy is radically
different to that which existed in 1845, with a population twenty-five per cent
stronger. Care for the elderly may well be a more automated matter in times to
come, with the advent of technological communications, but I happen to feel
very strongly on this matter. We in England do not look after our own
families enough but, on the contrary, are too inclined to pass them off as
encumbrances to pleasure-seeking and shallow holiday-making. My family looked
after our beloved matriarch, who reached the grand age of ninety-one, through
all illnesses (of which there were many), to the very end with minimal professional
medical assistance (and this all according to the matriarch's deepest wishes). There
are other debates to be had regarding the elderly and economics.
Above
all, I believe the native populations of Europe are about proportional to their
geographic size, and if they are shrinking so much the better, or perhaps an
effort might be made to maintain them at present levels. The trouble is
elsewhere, amongst much larger nations with far greater populations, where birthrates
are spiralling radically out of control, to the detriment of their own average life
quality and expectancy. Clearly the effect of widespread contraception, of
general education, and economic advancement, is to cause this tempering of
birthrates, and therefore those should continue to be the means utilised.
A Complete List of the Nations of the World in Order of Size (by Area).
I have put two asterisks ** on
the countries with a Higher Population than the United Kingdom and one asterisk
* on the countries with a Higher Population than England, of which there are 21
and 24 respectively.
Please realise, all the others
without asterisks have fewer people living in them than our own fair but vastly
overcrowded little land.
In square brackets [] are the
positions of each country by nominal G.D.P., these rankings include dependencies, hence their higher total numbers. I have also put in bold countries of
particular significance to the argument.
001. Russia.** [11.]
002. Canada. [10.]
003. China.** [2.]
004. United States.** [1.]
005. Brazil.** [9.]
006. Australia. [14.]
007. India.** [5.]
008. Argentina. [24.]
009. Kazakhstan. [52.]
010. Algeria. [56.]
011. Democratic Republic of the
Congo.** [90.] (The country with the Third Highest Birthrate in the world
(5.56).)
012. Saudi Arabia. [19.]
013. Mexico.** [12.]
014. Indonesia.** [16.]
015. Sudan. [117.]
016. Libya. [101.]
017. Iran.** [42.]
018. Mongolia. [131.]
019. Peru. [51.]
020. Chad. [150.]
021. Niger. [134.] (The
country with the Highest Birthrate in the world (6.73).)
022. Angola. [71.] (The country with the Second Highest
Birthrate in the world (5.76).)
023. Mali. [122.]
024. South Africa.* [41.]
025. Colombia. [43.]
026. Ethiopia.** [60.]
027. Bolivia. [95.]
028. Mauritania. [154.]
029. Egypt.** [38.]
030. Tanzania.* [76.]
031. Nigeria.** [39.]
032. Venezuela. [72.]
033. Pakistan.** [46.]
034. Namibia. [149.]
035. Mozambique. [121.]
036. Turkey.** [17.]
037. Chile. [45.]
038. Zambia. [113.]
039. Myanmar. [86.]
040. Afghanistan. [141.]
041. South Sudan. [163.]
042. France.** [7.]
043. Somalia. [152.]
044. Central African Republic.
[178.]
045. Ukraine. [58.]
046. Madagascar. [139.]
047. Botswana. [125.]
048. Kenya. [67.]
049. Yemen. [123.]
050. Thailand.* [30.]
051. Spain. [15.]
052. Turkmenistan. [78.]
053. Cameroon. [94.]
054. Papua New Guinea. [108.]
055. Uzbekistan.[73.]
056. Sweden. [25.]
057. Morocco. [61.]
058. Iraq. [49.]
059. Paraguay. [98.]
060. Zimbabwe. [106.]
061. Norway. [27.]
062. Japan.** [4.]
063. Germany.** [3.]
064. Congo. [143.]
065. Finland. [48.]
066. Vietnam.** [35.]
067. Malaysia. [36.]
068. Ivory Coast. [80.]
069. Poland. [21.]
070. Oman. [68.]
071. Italy.* [8.]
072. Philippines.** [34.]
073. Ecuador. [65.]
074. Burkina Faso. [124.]
075. New Zealand. [53.]
076. Gabon. [129.]
077. Guinea. [119.]
078. United Kingdom [6.] (But
83% or so of the Entire Population Lives in England Alone).
079. Uganda. [91.]
080. Ghana. [83.]
081. Romania. [44.]
082. Laos. [144.]
083. Guyana. [136.]
084. Belarus. [88.]
085. Kyrgyzstan. [148.]
086. Senegal. [109.]
087. Syria. [128.]
088. Cambodia. [110.]
089. Uruguay. [84.]
090. Suriname. [173.]
091. Tunisia. [92.]
092. England. [Alone, it would be 8th.]
093. Bangladesh.* [33.]
(The only country with a Higher Population and a Smaller Land Mass than
England).
094. Nepal. [100.]
095. Tajikistan. [151.]
096. Greece. [54.]
097. Nicaragua. [133.]
098. North Korea. [135.]
099. Malawi. [147.]
100. Eritrea. [185.]
101. Benin. [127.]
102. Honduras. [105.]
103. Liberia. [169.]
104. Bulgaria. [69.]
105. Cuba. [63.]
106. Guatemala. [70.]
107. Iceland. [111.]
108. South Korea. [13.]
109. Hungary. [57.]
110. Portugal. [50.] (The fact
that Portugal is a good deal larger than Scotland shows how deceptive maps can
be).
111. Jordan. [93.]
112. Serbia. [85.]
113. Azerbaijan. [82.]
114. Austria. [28.]
115. United Arab Emirates. [31.]
116. Czech Republic. [47.]
117. Scotland. [Alone, it would be
50th.]
118. Panama. [77.]
119. Sierra Leone. [174.]
120. The Republic of Ireland. [26.]
121. Georgia. [112.]
122. Sri Lanka. [87.]
123. Lithuania. [81.]
124. Latvia. [96.]
125. Togo. [157.]
126. Croatia. [79.]
127. Bosnia and Herzegovina.
[115.]
128. Costa Rica. [75.]
129. Slovakia. [62.]
130. Dominican Republic. [64.]
131. Estonia. [99.]
132. Denmark. [37.]
133. Netherlands. [18 (An
extraordinarily high position for its size and awkward geography, I think
proving my thesis).]
134. Switzerland. [20
(The same again).]
135. Bhutan. [180.]
136. Taiwan. [22.]
137. Guinea-Bissau. [190.]
138. Moldova. [137.]
139. Belgium. [23.]
140. Lesotho. [184.]
141. Armenia. [118.]
142. Solomon Islands. [192.]
143. Albania. [120.]
144. Equatorial Guinea. [156.]
145. Burundi. [177.]
146. Haiti. [116.]
147. Rwanda. [145.]
148. North Macedonia. [138.]
149. Djibouti. [170.]
150. Belize. [176.]
151. Israel. [29.]
(The Combined Population of
Every Nation Below This Point (Excluding Wales and Northern Ireland) is
Approximately 48,166,621 People, or About 8 or 9 Million People Less Than the
Population of England Alone.
152. El Salvadaor. [104.]
153. Wales. [Alone, it would be 68th.]
154. Slovenia. [89.]
155. Fiji. [167.]
156. Kuwait. [59.]
157. Eswatini. [168.]
158. East Timor. [188.]
159. Northern Ireland. [Alone, it
would be 90th.]
(The Combined Population of
Every Nation Below This Point (up to Vatican City) is 31,016,425, Around 16
Million Less Than England Alone.)
160. Bahamas. [146.]
161. Montenegro. [160.]
162. Vanuatu. [197.]
163. Qatar. [55.]
164. Gambia. [183.]
165. Jamaica. [132.]
166. Lebanon. [103.]
167. Cyprus. [107.]
168. Brunei. [140.]
169. Trinidad and Tobago. [114.]
170. Cape Verde. [181.]
171. Samoa. [201.]
172. Luxembourg. [74.]
173. Mauritius. [142.]
(Every Country Below This Point
(up to Vatican City) Added Together Equates to a Slightly Lower Population Than
the Rest of the United Kingdom (Excluding England) Combined (Approximately
10,962,378). Singapore, Bahrain, and Comoros, are the Outliers, Excluding Which
the Total Population Would Be Approximately 2,709,403.)
174. Comoros. [195.]
175. Sao Tome and Principe.
[203.]
176. Kiribati. [210.]
177. Bahrain. [97.] (Population
of 1,577,059).
178. Dominica. [202.]
179. Tonga. [204.]
180. Singapore. [32 (an
extraordinary ranking for its size).] (Population of 5,917,600).
181. Micronesia. [205.]
182. Saint Lucia. [182.]
(Every Country Below This Point
is Smaller than the Isle of Man, and the Total Population of Them All Put
Together is: 1,922,016 (About the Same as the County of Hampshire)).
183. Andorra. [172.]
184. Palau. [209.]
185. Seychelles. [186.]
186. Antigua and Barbuda. [191.]
187. Barbados. [164.]
188. Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines. [200.]
189. Grenada. [196.]
190. Malta. [126.]
191. Maldives. [161.]
192. Saint Kitts and Nevis. [199.]
193. Marshall Islands. [108.]
194. Liechtenstein. [162.]
195. San Marino. [189.]
196. Tuvalu. [213.]
197. Nauru. [211.]
198. Monaco. [158.]
199. Vatican City. [Null.]
No comments:
Post a Comment